Framework 21

Entries categorized as ‘Psychological adaptation’

David Foster Wallace and “the terrible master”

September 16, 2008 · Leave a Comment

“In 2004, [suicide] was the eleventh leading cause of death in the U.S., accounting for 32,439 deaths.” (NIMH website).

Next time you look at a baseball stadium that holds approximately 5,000 people, imagine  6 of these stadiums filled with people – and that’s for 2004 alone.

In 2008, around the world, the number is closer to one million per year.[1]

I was sad to learn that David Foster Wallace committed suicide last Friday.

Quoting from Wallace’s 2005 Kenyon commencement address:

“Twenty years after my own graduation, I have come gradually to understand that the liberal arts cliché about teaching you how to think is actually shorthand for a much deeper, more serious idea:

learning how to think really means learning how to exercise some control over how and what you think. It means being conscious and aware enough to choose what you pay attention to and to choose how you construct meaning from experience. Because if you cannot exercise this kind of choice in adult life, you will be totally hosed.

Think of the old cliché about quote the mind being an excellent servant but a terrible master.This, like many clichés, so lame and unexciting on the surface, actually expresses a great and terrible truth. It is not the least bit coincidental that adults who commit suicide with firearms almost always shoot themselves in: the head. They shoot the terrible master. And the truth is that most of these suicides are actually dead long before they pull the trigger.” (Kenyon commencement address 2005)

When talking about the “terrible master” Wallace was talking about the importance of metacognition. If you read the entire 2005 address you will note that his speech is focused on highlighting the importance of being aware of how and what you think and how important this is today. It was a warning, both to himself and others.

He is not as blunt as I am when I write that we need to move past the idea that thought is something that “happens to us” – something that is out of our control – or worse, the idea that thought (or our mind) is “our master”.

Well-worn clichés like the idea that the mind is a “terrible master”, tend to metastasize and become cultural truths that people believe without questioning.

I think it’s important to understand that these well-worn beliefs are not necessarily our beliefs – they don’t have to be – and in light of the NIMH 2004 statistic of over 32 thousand deaths – we may be facing a desperate need of re-thinking.

I don’t think that we need to worry so much about our mind being the terrible master – as much as the effect of the cultural belief system – the external mind – has on us. Sometimes our cultures dictate beliefs and truths that need re-thinking.

Quotes from Wallace’s Kenyon commencement address 2005

“…To have just a little critical awareness about myself and my certainties. Because a huge percentage of the stuff that I tend to be automatically certain of is, it turns out, totally wrong and deluded. I have learned this the hard way, as I predict you graduates will, too.”

“the most obvious, important realities are often the ones that are hardest to see and talk about. Stated as an English sentence, of course, this is just a banal platitude, but the fact is that in the day to day trenches of adult existence, banal platitudes can have a life or death importance, or so I wish to suggest to you on this dry and lovely morning.”

References:

[1] World Health Organization

Wikipedia: David Foster Wallace

The New York Times: David Foster Wallace, Influential Writer, Dies at 46

Times Online: Davis Foster Wallace commits suicide

LaTimes online: “David Foster Wallace: Idealistic Skeptic”

Highly Recommended Reading:

Kenyon commencement address 2005

Related in this blog

Has metacognition arrived in popular culture?

Videos:

UCTV: (University of California Television): Part interview and part reading at the Museum of Contemporary Art San Diego (embedded below)

Search Results:

Mahalo collection of search results for David Foster Wallace

…………………..
-Daniel Montano

Categories: Cognitive Science · Critical Thinking · Metacognition · Philosophy of Mind · Philosophy of Thought · Problem-solving · Psychological adaptation · Thinking

Questions: An essential part of life ?

May 14, 2007 · Leave a Comment

I challenge you to think without asking yourself a single question for 5 minutes.

If you are able to do that then perhaps you’re probably already a Zen master or on your way to become one. But I highly doubt anyonce can stop process of internal inquiry at all levels of the human body.

The majority of thinking seems to be based on chains of questions. From our super complex thought all the way down to the very basic levels of simple organisms we seem to be asking questions.

Of course when we get to the simpler organisms we don’t call them questions. We call them “feedback loops”. In my view feedback loops are types of questions that gather information about environmental data. (internal-external)

In the same way our body asks questions. Every time you take a step your body is calculating how much weight and pressure it needs to support. This calculation varies depending on if you’re walking uphill or downhill, if the step is among sand or concrete etc. So, yes, even the simple act of walking takes hundreds of tiny and complex questions.

All our senses – if we could hear them thinking – are asking millions of questions every minute. “What’s the heart rate?”, “How far is that door?”, “Who is that person?”, “How much pressure do I need to apply on this keyboard?”, “Where is the letter “W” on this keyboard? etc.

I will dare to say that if we look at the human organism from a holistic perspective (one that includes thought/cognition at all levels of the system) – then we can’t live without asking ourselves questions.

By association we also can’t live if we don’t think (once again if you recognize cell organization, communication, organ system collaboration etc).

Thinking, breathing, eating, questions, interacting, awareness, consciousness, communication, feeling, sensing, all of these are essential to life when you look at the human organism at all levels.

Questions from the holistic perspective, are essential to life. So, why have’t we organized them, categorized them, classified them?

I realized this back in December ‘06 and since then I’ve taken some action by attempting to categorize some types of questions. My hope is that we will become conscious of questions as essential tools for our lives. Hopefully as we become more conscious of how we use them we will simultaneously improve our thinking, our lives and our relationships with others.

Learning and Sharing
I have gone on to add some of the question types to Wikipedia. I am also hoping that some of you are able to contribute to the list there.

Related in this blog
Types of Questions >>

Related on Wikipedia
Wikipedia: “Questions” >>
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Anthropology · Cognitive Psychology · Cognitive Science · Collective problem-solving · Communication · Education · Integral intelligence · Interdisciplinary education · Multidisciplinary education · Philosophy · Philosophy of Mind · Problem-solving · Psychological adaptation · Psychology · Social ecology · Social innovation · Social sculpture · Sociology · Systems philosophy

(Possible) cycle of consciousness

May 11, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Diagram of the

Diagram: “The Cycle of Life” by Toru Sato.

Summary of “A (potential) Cycle of Consciousness pt.1″
(summarizing a blog posting from May)
We begin life without consciousness of the “self” and we move to a point where we once again discover how interconnected we are to everything and everyone else in the world. This awareness may lead to the end of the “micro self”. This may also become the beginning of a “macro-self” that includes humanity and the environment at large; (maybe more?)

Today I found this diagram by Toru Sato. According to the blog posting where I found it, [1] it is from a book called The Ever-Transcending Spirit, [2], and it deals with the “cycle of life”.

This diagram mirrors the (potential) cycle of consciousness I described above.

(Thanks to folks at the Unurthed blog for finding this great diagram.)

[1] Blog posting found at: Unurthed blog >

[2] The diagram is from diagram from Toru Sato’s The Ever-Transcending Spirit. (WorldCat Link)

Related in this blog:
A possible cycle in consciousness pt.1 >
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Deep ecology · Ecosophy · Empathy · Integral intelligence · Intelligent Systems Theory · Philosophy of Mind · Psychological adaptation · Self-organization · Social ecology · Social theory · Sustainable societies · ecopsychology

The age of machine-mediated empiricism

May 3, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Traditional human-based empiricism as we knew it through many years ended with the advent of technology. It shifted and became a hybrid of linear mechanics and phenomenology. Today it is another type of hybrid it, is a hybrid of human phenomenology and digital phenomenology.

Since science leads our concept of reality and science uses quite a bit of technology to gather and interpret data the resulting empiricism is what we may call hyper-empirical.

This name reminds us that the science we produce today is pre-packaged with the limitations and ideologically-based algorithms of our technology. In other words, the limitations of our technology contributes to the limitations of our perceptions – and eventually to the perceptions of our reality.

Our current concept of hyperreality needs to go beyond the concept of the simulacrum. It may go beyond the copy of copies. Today we have to recognize that digital systems are directly involved in the construction of reality itself (a growing trend).

Hyper-empiricism has become the extension of human senses. This is all based on ideas, concepts and assumptions about the way we think. (some of these need to be challenged).

In other words, how we think informs the way we process knowledge, and the way we decide machines should work in order for them to think for us and/or help us think.

The end of pure human empiricism
We need to understand a couple of things:
1. pure (unadulturated) empiricism may not exist. Machines are expressions of philosophies. Science is an expression of philosophies. So are methodologies, interpretations etcc.
2. pure (unadulturated) rationalism (innate ideas), may not exist. As long as we intermingle our innate ideas (cognition) with sense experience and digital empiricism it will be hard to show an innate idea being strictly “pure”.

This means that orthodox attempts insisting in “purity” (on both sides of the binary fence) may be a bit off. The great thing is that we have a mixture of these two in between them.

The new sense organs of reality
I think that both, science and the companies devoted to creating our new “sense organs” (computers) – need to collaborate in interdisciplinary teams that include specialists in many different theories of thought. This in a way will lead to the synthesis of empiricism with other forms of thinking – including forms of thought that are not traditionally considered to be empirical.

Like it or not this is a political process as much as anything else in human sytems. Reality is partially a product of politics. But as long as we are able to think and move, politics will be present. Our awareness of the role of politics in our reality is an essential awareness in our modern consciousness. Not to know this could be a dangerous type of ignorance.

This is why I keep repeating myself: The future of humanity depends on its ability to think (and act) in a humane and sustainable manner.

Products in the post-empirical era
This means that constructing a product is no longer an act of pure innovation but rather an act of transdisciplinary collaborative thinking. In other words, your product may work wonders but as long as it is not evaluated from different perspectives it will not succeed for long. (as you may have guessed I am personally mostly thinking about sustainability-related philosophies that contribute to positive user experiences)

The short version: Transdisciplinary Holism
Another way: Holistic Literacy, Holistic consciousness, Holistic awareness

In more detail: (this is where you start designing..but here are some ideas)
• Holistic education: Encourage transdisciplinary thought across all branches of education and in business.
• Holistic thought and action: balance specialities with transdisciplinary education (in continuous cycles)
• Thought literacy: Everyone should be aware of the hundreds of types of thinking that we have available for our use (see also:Philosophy
• Sustainability Literacy : Learn about sustainability
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Anthropology · Cognitive Psychology · Cognitive Science · Critical theory · Ecosophy · Innovation (history) · Intelligent Systems Theory · Interdisciplinary education · Multispectives · Philosophy · Philosophy of Mind · Psychological adaptation · Psychology · Social ecology · Social entrepreneurship · Social innovation · Social theory · Sociology · Sustainability · Sustainable design

Cultural dissonance

April 29, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Cultural dissonance is a phenomenon that may present itself when an individual that participates in multiple cultures (most of us) is faced with situations where s/he perceives conflicts between a set of rules from one culture and the rules of another. This phenomenon may even appear in the “same” culture (across time and across “sub-cultures”.)

We may be moving towards greater cultural complexity
Cultural complexity may be related to greater cultural interaction (a good thing) to encourage its continuous positive development we may need to address the complexity through better understanding of the emerging issues – cultural dissonance is one of these issues.

Studying cultural dissonance and cognitive dissonance together may help us ease dissonance on multiple levels.

While it’s not a panacea, it may certainly be an improvement in our current world consciousness.

Related in this blog
“Beyond Maslows Pyramid of (individual) needs”>>

Related on Wikipedia
Cultural Dissonance >>

Related on the web
Cultural harmony vs. cultural dissonance. Philosophical approaches to conflict resolution. Robert N. St. Clair (University of Louisville, USA)
YuXin Jia (Harbin Institute of Technology, PR of China)

CULTURAL DISSONANCE AMONG GENERATIONS: A SOLUTION-FOCUSED APPROACH WITH EAST ASIAN ELDERS AND THEIR FAMILIESJournal of Marital and Family Therapy, Oct 2004 by Lee, Mo Yee, Mjelde-Mossey, LeeAnn.

Cultural Dissonance.Multiverse. Exploring divesity and achievement.

(a thesis on cultural dissonance)

Mapping the Future Rich (nations) get richer … gaps widen, cultural dissonance looms, environmental threats grow Virginia Tech University. Department of Architecture and Urban Studies

Gordon, E., & Yowell, C. (1999). Cultural dissonance as a risk factor in the development of students. In E. Gordon (Ed.), Education and justice: A view from the back of the bus (pp. 34-51). New York: Teachers College Press.

Tierney, W. (1993). Building communities of difference: Higher education in the twenty first century. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey

Categories: Cognitive Psychology · Cognitive Science · Collective problem-solving · Communication · Complexity · Cultural anthropology · Cybernetics · Education · Global dynamics · Humane Systems Design · Interdisciplinary education · Multidisciplinary education · Non-profit organizations · Philosophy of Mind · Problem-solving · Psychiatry · Psychological adaptation · Social ecology · Social theory · Sociology

Distributed causality and time

April 27, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Summary: Distributed causality factors in time and (space) distance. What you do today may affect someone in another country years from now. It’s hard to draw the line of causality in simple terms but to some relative degree, your action ‘A’ causes effect ‘Z’ over time and distance.

Beyond real-time cause and effect
In a completely interconnected system operating with multiple layers and cycles of causality event ‘A’ may be “caused” by any event A-Z to one relative degree or another.

Distributed Causality and Sustainability
This is complex causality. It broadens our way of understanding relationships between things and variables.

Distributed causality broadens responsibility. What you do today will affect more people than you think. How you behave may affect your mind, your body, those around you, those who know you, those who don’t know you and perhaps even those who are not even born yet.

Distributed causality may help us think more holistically. It may help our concept of sustainability.
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Cognitive Psychology · Cognitive Science · Collective problem-solving · Deep ecology · Network science · Permaculture · Philosophy · Philosophy of Mind · Pollution · Problem-solving · Psychological adaptation · Psychology · Relationship Architecture · Social ecology · Social theory · Sociology · Sustainability · Sustainable design · Systems Theory · Systems intelligence · Systems thinking

From Causality to “Distributed Causality”

April 26, 2007 · Leave a Comment

April 27, 2007

“Logic is a poor model of cause and effect.” – Gregory Bateson.

In philosophy the idea of causality has been bounced around for a while. David Hume proposed “…his theory of causality – that our beliefs about cause and effect depend on sentiment, custom and habit, and not upon reason, nor upon abstract, timeless, general Laws of Nature.” [1]. Today we have the option of drawing from multiple perspectives of knowledge to continue to re-understand causality. For example, from science we may draw from physics[2] and we may compare and synthesize ideas to come up with new perspectives on causality[3].

Degrees of Causality
The idea that A causes B may need to be re-understood. If we take the lens of complex dynamics in networked systems we may understand that there is a phenomenon of “distributed co-causality” happening all around us.

In other words, the idea that A causes B may need to be re-understood as:
B may be caused by A and A-Z to various, relative degrees across time.

This concept may be related to the “butterfly effect” (from physics), a concept, where one small change may lead to large changes (usually over time and over space – in other words, some apects of causality are not necessarily immediate and direct relationships that we can witnessed in real-time). (akin to a domino effect or a chain reaction / chain of causality).

This means that in a system where everything is interconnected causality may be:
- distributed
- relative to various degrees
- undetectable to basic human logic and sense capabilities
- (seemingly) non-linear or beyond basic linear comprehension

big bang dominoes
So, we are back to the domino effect only that in this domino effect we have billions of several interconnected lines of dominoes that have been tipping each other simultaneously for 13.7 billion years. This masssive chain reaction defies the logic of narrow causality unless we limit the scope of consideration – in other words – unless we deny the wider scope of distributed causality.

The need for holistic thought methods
If we adopt the concept of distributed causality we may also recognize that type of logical mapping as a base for the need for holistic perspectives and wider methods of thinking.

In other words, shifting to alternative models of thinking will no longer be something that would be “nice for us to do some day”…but rather, the shift will become understood as a necessity.

Systems thinking [4] and human factors [5] may be two areas of research to consider but I would think that non-linear dynamics need to be considered as part of the thought methodology.

Yet another, system of consideration was proposed by Sir Austin Bradford Hill [7], in his article, “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?,” (1965). This consideration system will need to be re-examined with the contemporary knowledge (hopefully one that utilizes holistic-oriented methodologies).

Whichever methodology we opt to use will surely need to be tras-disciplinary, and open to multiple views of causality (linear, multilinear, non-linear).

Context
Also, it’s important to differentiate the context of need for nonlinear thought and distributed causality. We obviously don’t need to evaluate every action through this lens with the same degree of rigor attention.

What will need re-understanding and new methodologies
- All logical models and conclusions based on narrow causality
- (others…)

This type of shift in logic system is a shift towards divergence. Once we re-undertand and re-adjust our systems we can compliment the divergence with convergeance and simplexity efforts.


Annotations
[1] Wikipedia: David Hume>>
[2] Wikipedia: “Butterfly effect”>>
[3] Wikipedia: Causality>>
[4] Wikipedia: “Systems thinking” >>
[5] Wikipedia: Human factors>>
[6] Wikipedia:
[7] Austin Bradford Hill, “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58 (1965), 295-300.Related in Wikipedia
- Chain reactions >>
- Domino effect>>
- Wikipedia: “Control theory”>>
-

Multi-Input-Multi-Output Systems (MIMO)
- http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=15692903
- Build State-Space Models for Multi-Input Multi-Output Systems

Non-linear Control Systems
- “Non-linear control”
**MIMO and non-linear control concepts expose concepts of complex, non-linear causality. These links are only for reference.

“Observability” – Related to: when a system is complex beyond “observability” (or sensing). A possible point towards the end of basic human empiricism
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Complexity · Empathy · Multidisciplinary education · Netsci · Network science · Philosophy · Philosophy of Mind · Physics · Psychological adaptation · Psychology · Quantum physics · Sociology · Systems Theory · Systems intelligence · Systems thinking · Transdisciplinary Education

Evolutionary psychology: Its programs, prospects, and pitfalls

March 28, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Evolutionary psychology: Its programs, prospects, and pitfalls
ANDREW NEHER — Cabrillo College Abstract:

“The emerging specialty of evolutionary psychology presents a challenge to mainstream psychology. It proposes that cognitive, not just more fundamental, traits in humans are grounded in dedicated evolutionary programs. Specifically, it maintains that the common assumption in psychology—that the complexities of our psyches have been largely freed from evolutionary constraints and are instead based in a general learning capacity—is mistaken. The major premises of evolutionary psychology are examined in light of arguments and evidence presented by both supporters and detractors. Although some of these premises are well grounded, others are questionable and limit the development of the specialty and its integration into mainstream psychology.”

Source:

American Journal of Psychology. http://ajp.press.uiuc.edu/119/4/neher.html

…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Psychological adaptation · Psychology · Reunderstanding · Social ecology · Social theory

Beyond Maslow’s hierarchy of (individual) needs

March 2, 2007 · Leave a Comment

This diagram tries to show cycles of attention, from the individual to the macro-systems in which the individual exists. This diagram is a suggestion and it may be drawn differently in societies that are group-centered rather than individual-centered. The same idea applies to those groups that are family-centered or couple-centered. An individual and a society may hold changing “centers” across time.

Dynamic Center (focus) 

Perhaps more interestingly, this center may be dynamic and may change, frequently depending on many factors and variables. (this may also be the part of the cause for dissonance at many human and social levels).

Innovations that help us meet the goals of Maslow’s pyramid are important but they can be magnified in value when we integrate them with the value contained at each level of the macro-systems.

While there may be many changing centers the most stable are the high-level goals of the macrosystem. These may be: the survival and healthy development of our ecosystems and humanity. This may point us back to the need for the re-alignment of our man-designed systems with ecological interests and social causes that promote the development of human potential while in alignment with the best interstes of our planet.

How does your product or service deliver value across each of these levels?
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Collective problem-solving · Deep ecology · Design ethics · Humane Systems Design · Permaculture · Psychological adaptation · Social ecology · Social entrepreneurship · Social innovation · Sustainability · Visual communication

Are chaos and the brain related?

February 23, 2007 · 1 Comment

(Note: “chaos” in this posting refers to “chaos theory“.)

“In terms of complexity — both in size and shape — brain and chaos are really two giants. Although the former is a physical entity and the later a scientific concept, both are robust and thus, are dealt with by different branches of knowledge.

Chaos is common is nature, it can be found, for example, in chemical reactions, optics (lasers), electronic circuits, fluid dynamics (heat convection) etc. Many natural phenomena can also be characterized as being chaotic, such as the weather, solar activity and many living organism systems, such as the nervous system.

Does chaos has a function in the brain? In the following paragraphs we will make an effort to introduce the reader to these two phenomena and how they relate to each other. Indeed, a simple answer to complex issues like the present one is often misleading. So we try to be careful.” Read more >>

Another source:

The existance of chaos in the brain has only been a major topic of discussion among researchers for less than ten years. In that time, chaotic behavior has been discovered both on the microscopic (neural) level and the macroscopic level in the brain.

Read more >>

Chaos theory and the evolution of consciousness and mind: a thermodynamic-holographic resolution to the mind-body problem

A nonlinear approach to brain function: deterministic chaos and sleep EEG.

Measuring chaos in the brain: a tutorial review of nonlinear dynamical EEG analysis.

The role of brain chaos

Brain chaos and computation

Controlling chaos in the brain (Nature mag)

http://www.cerebromente.org.br/n14/mente/chaos.html

http://plus.maths.org/issue35/features/dartnell/index.html

http://www.schuelers.com/chaos/chaos8.htm

http://uncletaz.com/library/scimath/brainchaos.html

http://www.worldscibooks.com/medsci/4347.html

http://sulcus.berkeley.edu/FreemanWWW/manuscripts/IC13/90.html

http://nepenthes.lycaeum.org/Misc/chaos.html

http://www.esat.kuleuven.ac.be/sista/chaoslab/pictures.html

Images found on search engine: KW “chaos”, “strange attractor” “bifurcation”

Categories: Artificial Intelligence · Cognitive Psychology · Cognitive Science · Complexity · Information visualization · Intelligent Systems Theory · Multinformation · Netsci · Network science · Physics · Psychological adaptation · Psychology · Quantum physics · Systems thinking · Thinking · Visual communication