Framework 21

Entries categorized as ‘Social theory’

A brief history of (ancient) systems thinking

October 26, 2008 · 3 Comments

Systems thinking is not new. I have been thinking about its ancient history and so far this is what I have gathered:

  • 600 B.C. – philosophers used systems thinking to organize their thoughts (e.g. Lao Tze)
  • 2,700 B.C. – Egyptians, like Imhotep, showed evidence that he was using systems thinking during his roles as architect, physician and engineer in Egypt.
  • 4,000 B.C. – Cuneiform, a system of writing appears thanks to the need to keep track of multiple economic transactions.
  • (date pending) – the beginnings of economic (value exchange systems). My assumption here is that value exchange systems were designed by systems thinkers.
  • (90,000 B.C.) – the beginnings of organized belief systems. You can find traces of these belief systems going back as far as 90,000 B.C. [1].  Rather than being “designed” the earliest belief systems may have emerged at the individual level. People may have organized, and synthesized them into coherent systems.
  • (date pending) – the emergence of spoken languages. We needed communication systems to organize ourselves and our societies. Spoken language is a designed system that has many semi-organized contributors. So, our spoken languages, the basic tools of all societies, may be an example of an ancient, living and breathing example of systems thinking.
  • (date pending) – Meaning.  The emergence of symbolic meaning and symbolic communication. Meaning emerges within interactive systems of signs and symbols.[2]
  • (date pending) – Culture. Culture is an interactive system between people. More specifically, it is a shared system for thought and behavior. It may be an emergent system that eventually gains organization between its member/participants. It may be the fertile ground in which meaning, languages, and communication systems grow.

Did systems thinking aid the emergence of civilization?

In some aspects we may be able to chart a parallel line between the emergence of human civilization and the emergence of systems thinking.

Why is systems thinking so rare in our society?

So, now the question is…if systems thinking is such an old way of thinking, and if systems thinking has played such a key role in the development of many tools of civilization for thousands of years, then why isn’t it more popular as a thinking method in our cultures? According to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers only 3% of our population are systems thinkers. (see also [2.1])

I suspect one reason for this lack of adoption has something to do with a lack of value associated with it and a lack of recognition of the role it has played within our societies.

Acknowledging its historical presence and its contribution to civilization may help us recognize its value.

Addendum: 10-31-08

Most of us are systems thinkers?

Another way to think systems thinking is to focus on how system’s thinking has permeated most aspects of our civilized life to the point that we no longer realize that we’re using systems thinking. Instead, systems thinking has become like the air that we breathe, highly important but mostly invisible and undetectable by our socialized minds. [2.2]

So, in a way, most of us are participating in systems thinking. We participate in it by living our lives within systems designed by systems thinkers.

But there is a huge difference between doing something with awareness of our acts and doing something without awareness. One may lead us to the development of skills, the other may be like going through the motions (zombie, or robot-like behavior) [3].

Why learn about systems thinking? One reason may be to gain awareness of the systems we participate in. Yet another reason may be to gain the critical skills to understand how these systems function and how they affect us and others. If we are going to change and improve these systems then we need to first understand them.

[1] Encyclopedia Britannica Online Edition

[2] Wikipedia: “Semiotics”; “Symbolism”;

[2.1] Wyospace blog “Systems Thinking

[2.2] Wikipedia: “Socialization”. Also recommended, David Foster Wallace’s Kenyon’s commencement address, May 21,2005.

[3] Another old concept. A related concept the allegory of the cave.

…………………………………………….

- Daniel Montano

………………………

Categories: Cognitive Science · Critical Thinking · Social theory · Systems thinking · Thinking · Thoughts

Survival of the selfless

November 5, 2007 · Leave a Comment

The current issue of New Scientist Magazine has an interesting article that compares selfish behaviors with altruistic behaviors and produces a theory of how group-oriented collaboration has a track record of survival.


“ALTHOUGH a high standard of morality gives but a slight or no advantage to each individual man and his children over the other men of the same tribe… an advancement in the standard of morality will certainly give an immense advantage to one tribe over another.”In this famous passage from The Descent of Man, published in 1871, Charles Darwin perceived a fundamental problem of social life, and a possible solution. The problem is that for a society to function, its members must perform services for each other. Yet members who behave “for the good of the group” often put themselves at a disadvantage compared with more selfish members of the same group. If so, then how can altruism and other prosocial behaviours evolve?The solution, according to Darwin, is that groups containing mostly altruists have a decisive advantage over groups containing mostly selfish individuals, even if selfish individuals have …”

The link below links to a page that contains the same text as above. To read more a subscription is necessary. The print version of this issue is worth it’s price as it has a few other articles of interest.

Source:
Evolution: Survival of the selfless – being-human – 03 November 2007 – New Scientist

New Scientist Magazine: Current Issue contents >

Related in this blog:
Beyond Abraham Maslow’s Pyramid of (Individual) Needs >
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Problem-solving · Social ecology · Social entrepreneurship · Social theory · Sociology · Sustainable societies · Urban Design

Gregory Bateson’s Mind and Nature.

November 4, 2007 · Leave a Comment

I’m reading Gregory Bateson’s book, Mind and Nature. Bateson was an anthropologist, sociologist, second order cyberneticist and philosopher. In this book Bateson wrote an accessible philosophy that acknowledges issues in science and in popular forms of thinking.

I would recommend this book to anyone that likes this blog. Mind and Nature proposes transdisciplinary studies as an effort to greater understanding. Mind and Nature also questions the lenses we use to interpret our world. It points out presuppositions built into some of those lenses. All of this is done in plain, accessible language.

Two full chapters of Mind and Nature, available free online >

Mind and Nature. A Necessary Unity on Worldcat.org >

Gregory Bateson in Wikipedia >

An independent review of Mind and Nature >

Bateson, G. (1980). Mind and nature a necessary unity. Toronto: Bantam Books.
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Critical Thinking · Cybernetics · Philosophy of Mind · Social ecology · Social theory · Sociology · Systems Theory · Systems thinking · Thinking

Five Trends That Will Transform Society

October 16, 2007 · Leave a Comment

“Author Richard Watson examines emerging patterns and developments and society, politics, science and technology, media and entertainment, and other industries in his book Future Files: A History of the Next 50 Years — and makes educated, and witty speculations as to where they might take us.”

Source:
Fast Company; Five Trends That Will Transform Society >

Related in this blog:
New Scientist Magazine: 50 Scientists Forecast the Future >
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Anthropology · Cultural anthropology · Cultural studies · Multidisciplinary education · Social theory

Reading list 10-11-2007

October 12, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Oxford University Press just reprinted a book called the Oxford Guide to Philosophy, edited by Ted Honderich. This is a dictionary-like, encyclopedia-like book with 1,000 pages delving into philosophy from A-Z. This hardback is surprisingly affordable ($9.99 U.S.D. at Border’s Books and Music). If you’re a geek like me, you may find that the elaborate “maps of philosophy” (extensive tree diagrams showing the taxonomy of the large philosophical branches), are worth the $10.00 all by themselves.

The Assault On Reason by Al Gore is a must read for anyone trying to make sense of the last 8 years of political turmoil in the U.S. In this book Al Gore acknowledges either/or fallacious thinking as a problem in our time. He analyzes the tactics and blunders used by our current administration. More importantly, he acknowledges the undermining of free critical thought. This is a great book for those who may have put a foot through their TV or radio back in 2000. Or for those that four years later took a peak at the TV once again only to hear our poor misguided neighbors in the red states chanting “four more years!”

An older but goody, (also available on audio), is Daniel Goleman’s book, Social Intelligence. This book covers topics that may be of interest to those fascinated by psychology, psycho-pathology, cognitive science, neuroscience and culture in general. I was surprised to find in this book early references to those mysterious “mirror neurons” and plenty of material on empathy as a form of intelligence.

A book that should be reprinted:
There’s a book that I enjoy browsing from time to time. It’s called The Oxford Companion to The Mind, edited by Richard L. Gregory. This book, like the philosophy book above, is an encyclopedia of topics related to the philosophy and science of the mind. Today new theories in the philosophy of mind field and new discoveries in neuroscience, cognitive science etc. should provide plenty of opportunities for updates to the material in that book. Heck, even the old version (1987) is still an interesting read. It’s been 10 years. I’d say that a new version is due now.
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Cognitive Psychology · Cognitive Science · Philosophy · Psychology · Social theory

How Crime May Affect Health Indirectly

October 11, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Somewhere among the big pile of tags I use on this blog there’s one called “social-ecology”. I created this tag in order to classify stories and thoughts about how our built-environment, (urban design and the dynamics within it) affect our society.

My goal here is not only to raise awareness but also to trigger innovations that address these newly recognized challenges. This shows how seemingly unrelated factors actually have complex co-causal relationships.

This is systems-thinking in action.

“NEW YORK (Reuters Health) – People who are worried about crime in their neighborhood tend to have worse physical and mental health than their peers who aren’t as concerned about being crime victims, UK researchers report.”The study highlights the importance of the neighborhood, the local environment for health,” Dr. Mai Stafford of University College London told Reuters Health. “It shows that fear of crime is not just an emotional response.”People who are more afraid of crime aren’t necessarily at greater risk of being victimized, Stafford and her team point out. But they were less likely to exercise, see friends, and be involved in social activities, all of which are important to maintaining physical and mental health, the researchers found.”

Source:
Fear of crime may erode physical and mental health | Health | Reuters
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Psychology · Social ecology · Social theory · Sustainable societies

The Assault on Reason

June 3, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Quoting Al Gore from a National Public Radio interview about his new book The Assault on Reason.

“The point of this book is that our nation is so shockingly vulnerable to such crass manipulation. And it’s happening over and over again…” – Al Gore (…talking about The Assault on Reason, his latest book. Via NPR)

I don’t know if Al Gore mentions this in his book but either/or thinking has been the most obvious tool used for such manipulation. It is alarming for me to see how many of us still fall for a thinking fallacy that has been so well documented for many years. It’s a problematic way of thinking that has been embedded in our academic textbooks (even at the advanced university level), in our speech, in our cultural fabric. Moving our logical habits from either/or thinking will require a serious effort in education and personal development.
Al Gore is a true international leader in the ecological and sustainability field. Today I also consider him to be a leader in systems thinking.

National Public Radio (NPR): Al Gore: ‘The Assault on Reason‘ >>

GreenAppleBooks.com: “The Assault on Reason” >>

Gore, A. (2007). The assault on reason. New York: Penguin Press. >>

The Century of the Self (related documentary)

The Power of Nightmares (Related documentary)

………………………………………………………………………………………………

Featured sustainability link

SocialEdge.org >>
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Cognitive Science · Cultural anthropology · Cultural studies · Social theory · Sustainable societies · Systems thinking · Thinking

Call for papers: social theory, politics and the arts

May 30, 2007 · Leave a Comment

New YorkUniversity’s Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, the Arts Council Manhattan, the Research Center for Leadership in Action, and the New York Foundation for the Arts are happy to invite proposals for the 33rd Conference on Social Theory, Politics and the Arts (STPA) being held on October 11-13, 2007 in New York City.

  • Role of the arts in bridging ethnic, cultural and regional differences
  • Artists and social change
  • Local and regional revitalization through the arts

The deadline is June 15, 2007.

Link

Culture info >>

…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Art · Design · Design ethics · Social innovation · Social theory · Sustainable design · Sustainable societies

Social innovation

May 29, 2007 · Leave a Comment

“Realizing that innovation driven solely by technology often failed to meet customer needs, many organizations turned to a consumer (marketing) oriented approach where consumer research and observation is handled by “experts”. Green believes that this approach is starting to reaching end of life. [Josephine Green's (of Philips Design)] main point is that we need to go beyond designing around individual consumer needs and start innovating around social needs. Her reasoning: We have reached a saturation point for technology and consumer goods. Continuing to consume the way we currently do is not healthy.”

“There is too much ‘stuff’ and a growing realization that filling the future with more and more consumer-driven technology and marketable goods does not necessarily guarantee higher growth, a better quality of life or even life itself, given the state of the planet.” (from NexUp)

Consumer research and observation are still important, the difference now is that these methods have to be integrated with a wider social purpose.

Source

NextUp: “Democratizing the Future” >>

Related

World Changing blog >>

Call for papers on Social Innovation >>

Customer World (blog): “Adding Social Innovation to Design” >>

Standford Center for Social Innovation >>

Categories: Collective problem-solving · Cultural anthropology · Cultural studies · Design thinking · Eco literacy · Ecosophy · Permaculture · Pollution · Social ecology · Social entrepreneurship · Social innovation · Social theory · Sociology · Sustainability · Sustainable design · Sustainable societies

Two blogs

May 24, 2007 · Leave a Comment

There are only two kinds of people – those who generalize and those who don’t” – unknown

Someone once wrote that there are two kinds of bloggers, those that point to the blog postings on other blogs and those that author original content. Well, I am pointing to two other blogs that write original postings that I think deserve note.

Design Dialogues

Quoting from the Design Dialogues blog:

Data: What resources do we have?
Information: What do we know about?
Knowledge: What do we know hot to do with what we know?
Comprehension: Where do we have mastery? (is it worth doing?)
Understanding: How well do we understand our context, opportunities and possibilities?
Wisdom: Knowing what we should do? (what’s the best decision?)
Transcendence: What does this mean? (What’s the best contribution we can make?)[1]

I like how the terms are “defined” by the associated questions.

Perspectives in Public Health

Here are two links to posting that I recommend from this blog:

The ten most important lessons from physics” >>

Systems thinking and the emergence of new life” >>

The importance of social relationships” >>

References
[1] Blog: Design Dialogues, “Understanding meaning as awareness“, May 17, 2007.

Blog links
Design Dialogues >>
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Perspectives in Public Health >>

Categories: Awareness · Consciousness · Multidisciplinary education · Philosophy of Mind · Psychology · Social ecology · Social theory · Sustainability · Sustainable societies · Systems philosophy · Systems thinking