Framework 21

Entries categorized as ‘Systems Theory’

Gregory Bateson’s Mind and Nature.

November 4, 2007 · Leave a Comment

I’m reading Gregory Bateson’s book, Mind and Nature. Bateson was an anthropologist, sociologist, second order cyberneticist and philosopher. In this book Bateson wrote an accessible philosophy that acknowledges issues in science and in popular forms of thinking.

I would recommend this book to anyone that likes this blog. Mind and Nature proposes transdisciplinary studies as an effort to greater understanding. Mind and Nature also questions the lenses we use to interpret our world. It points out presuppositions built into some of those lenses. All of this is done in plain, accessible language.

Two full chapters of Mind and Nature, available free online >

Mind and Nature. A Necessary Unity on Worldcat.org >

Gregory Bateson in Wikipedia >

An independent review of Mind and Nature >

Bateson, G. (1980). Mind and nature a necessary unity. Toronto: Bantam Books.
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Critical Thinking · Cybernetics · Philosophy of Mind · Social ecology · Social theory · Sociology · Systems Theory · Systems thinking · Thinking

Niklas Luhmann Interview

October 27, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Thanks to Strenge Jacke! Link-out for translating this Niklas Luhmann video interview.Link-out

In this video Luhmann covers a bit about general systems theory, and complex systems.
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Complexity · Systems Theory · Systems thinking · Video

Paper: Complexity and Self Organization

October 20, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Marcia J. Bates and Mary Niles Maak have written a very accessible paper called Complexity and Self Organization.

Quoting from the abstract of the paper:

“Abstract: this article introduces some of the main concepts and methods of the science studying complex, self-organizing systems and networks, in a non-technical manner. Complexity cannot be strictly defined, only situated in between order and disorder. A complex system is typically modeled as a collection of interacting agents, representing components as diverse as people, cells or molecules. Because of the non-linearity of the interactions, the overall system evolution is generally unpredictable and uncontrollable. However, the system tends to self-organize, in the sense that local interactions eventually produce global coordination and synergy. The resulting structure can in many cases be modeled as a network, with stabilized interactions functioning as links connecting the agents. Such complex, self-organized networks typically exhibit the properties of clustering, being scale-free, and forming a small-world. These ideas have obvious applications in information science when studying networks of authors and their publications.”

Source:
Download the paper here (PDF format) >>
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Complexity · Cybernetics · Emergence · Self-organization · Systems Theory

Beyond The Either/Or Fallacy of Nature vs. Nurture: Genes, environment and Co-Causality

October 13, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Another nice move towards a more holistic systems perspective:

“Among biology’s more riveting inquiries is the investigation of gene-environment interactions — the demonstration that a person’s genes constantly react to experience in a way that changes behavior, which in turn shapes environment, which in turn alters gene expression and so on. As David Olds described a few weeks ago, this new subdiscipline is yielding startling insights about how nature and nurture mix to help determine one’s health and character.”

Source:
Can nurture save you from your own genes? Genes, environment and depression: Sciam Observations
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Innovation · Innovation (history) · Sustainable societies · Systems Theory

The Technium

October 11, 2007 · Leave a Comment

I like this flip on our typical way of looking at technology. It also reminds me of Daniel Dennet’s narrative of the ant moving up and down a blade of grass – it’s mind had been “taken over” by a parasite – the ant hadbecome a vehicle for the parasite’s goals.

Kevin Kelly titled his post: “Humans Are the Sex Organs of Technology”:

“I claim that technology has its own agenda. What is the evidence that technology as a whole, or the technium as I call it, is autonomous? Because without autonomy, one could argue, how can something have its own agenda? I have three parts to my answer.First, I believe that a system can have an agenda even when it depends upon another system to remain viable. Let’s take the human mind and human culture. Obviously humans are animals, and just another creature of evolution. As a mammal, we must obey the rules of biology. We are part of the trajectory of living tissue: our flesh must breathe, metabolize, mate, excrete, and eventually die. The agenda of our bodies is exactly the agenda of any other animal body.”

Source: Kevin Kelly — The Technium…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Systems Theory · Systems philosophy

Languages are complex dynamic systems

May 17, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Gloria Capelli, a teacher and researcher at the University of Pisa has an interesting post on language:

“…languages are complex dynamic systems within which different types of structures act as organizers in order to make it possible for cognition to handle the immense amount of information involved in the communicative process. Within this view…words act at the same time as cues of mental representations, triggers of ad hoc conceptual constructions, and anchors which prevent meanings from verging on the border of chaos.”

Link
Go to the blog post on Gloria Capelli’s blog >>

Related in this blog
The unconscious mind, a communication system? >>
The human tower of babel (intra-human communication systems) >>

…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Anthropology · Complexity · Fractal cognition · Information communication · Intelligent Systems Theory · Intuition · Linguistics · Multinformation · Philosophy of Mind · Psychiatry · Psychology · Social ecology · Social theory · Sociology · Systems Theory

Systems thinking and dialectics

May 15, 2007 · Leave a Comment

The Ackoff Center Weblog has an interesting posting titled:
“Analysis, synthesis, systems thinking and the scientific method: rediscovering the importance of open systems”

Along with this entry they have a paper that you can download.

Quoting a bit from the blog posting:

This paper reconsiders the role of systems thinking in science …The paper argues that the scientific method is most usefully interpreted as a dialectic between analysis and synthesis supported by the triadic logic of C.S. Peirce, and that the role of systems thinking is to frame this dialectic.

References
The Ackoff Center Weblog >>
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Cognitive Psychology · Cognitive Science · Collective problem-solving · Ecosophy · Ethics in science · Permaculture · Social ecology · Social theory · Sociology · Sustainability · Systems Theory · Systems philosophy · Systems thinking · ecopsychology

Why complex systems are also social and temporal

May 1, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Dirk Baecker from Universität Witten/Herdecke | Zeppelin University in Dresden released an essay addressing social dynamics of complex systems.

ABSTRACT: The paper inquires into the paradox of complexity, the unity of variety, in order to first ask how a system may be able to unfold that paradox and then to look at two features informing the system to self-organize its complexity, which are the features of the social and the temporal. The paper refers to G Spencer-Brown’s calculus of indications as a suitable notational tool to both denote, and to inquire into, the form of a complex system.

Baecker introduces the paper by writing:

“It is an essay trying to introduce Spencer-Brown’s
Laws of Form as an appropriate method to inquire
into the paradox of complexity which Luhmann had
spelled out again and again with few peoples liste-
ning and which consists in the unity of diversity, the
philosophical tradition’s venerable problem of
Mannigfaltigkeit.”

About the paper
This paper was submitted to ECCS 2007 European Conference on Complex Systems, Dresden October 1-5, 2007

Download the paper:
http://homepage.mac.com/baecker/ComplexSystems.pdf

About Dirk Baecker:
http://homepage.mac.com/baecker/

Related in wikipedia
“Sociocybernetics”>>
“Systems theory”>>
“Systems philosophy”>>

You can find my feed here. …or at Technorati…

Categories: Complexity · Cybernetics · Psychology · Simplexity · Social ecology · Social theory · Sociology · Systems Theory · Systems philosophy · Systems thinking

Distributed causality and time

April 27, 2007 · Leave a Comment

Summary: Distributed causality factors in time and (space) distance. What you do today may affect someone in another country years from now. It’s hard to draw the line of causality in simple terms but to some relative degree, your action ‘A’ causes effect ‘Z’ over time and distance.

Beyond real-time cause and effect
In a completely interconnected system operating with multiple layers and cycles of causality event ‘A’ may be “caused” by any event A-Z to one relative degree or another.

Distributed Causality and Sustainability
This is complex causality. It broadens our way of understanding relationships between things and variables.

Distributed causality broadens responsibility. What you do today will affect more people than you think. How you behave may affect your mind, your body, those around you, those who know you, those who don’t know you and perhaps even those who are not even born yet.

Distributed causality may help us think more holistically. It may help our concept of sustainability.
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Cognitive Psychology · Cognitive Science · Collective problem-solving · Deep ecology · Network science · Permaculture · Philosophy · Philosophy of Mind · Pollution · Problem-solving · Psychological adaptation · Psychology · Relationship Architecture · Social ecology · Social theory · Sociology · Sustainability · Sustainable design · Systems Theory · Systems intelligence · Systems thinking

From Causality to “Distributed Causality”

April 26, 2007 · Leave a Comment

April 27, 2007

“Logic is a poor model of cause and effect.” – Gregory Bateson.

In philosophy the idea of causality has been bounced around for a while. David Hume proposed “…his theory of causality – that our beliefs about cause and effect depend on sentiment, custom and habit, and not upon reason, nor upon abstract, timeless, general Laws of Nature.” [1]. Today we have the option of drawing from multiple perspectives of knowledge to continue to re-understand causality. For example, from science we may draw from physics[2] and we may compare and synthesize ideas to come up with new perspectives on causality[3].

Degrees of Causality
The idea that A causes B may need to be re-understood. If we take the lens of complex dynamics in networked systems we may understand that there is a phenomenon of “distributed co-causality” happening all around us.

In other words, the idea that A causes B may need to be re-understood as:
B may be caused by A and A-Z to various, relative degrees across time.

This concept may be related to the “butterfly effect” (from physics), a concept, where one small change may lead to large changes (usually over time and over space – in other words, some apects of causality are not necessarily immediate and direct relationships that we can witnessed in real-time). (akin to a domino effect or a chain reaction / chain of causality).

This means that in a system where everything is interconnected causality may be:
- distributed
- relative to various degrees
- undetectable to basic human logic and sense capabilities
- (seemingly) non-linear or beyond basic linear comprehension

big bang dominoes
So, we are back to the domino effect only that in this domino effect we have billions of several interconnected lines of dominoes that have been tipping each other simultaneously for 13.7 billion years. This masssive chain reaction defies the logic of narrow causality unless we limit the scope of consideration – in other words – unless we deny the wider scope of distributed causality.

The need for holistic thought methods
If we adopt the concept of distributed causality we may also recognize that type of logical mapping as a base for the need for holistic perspectives and wider methods of thinking.

In other words, shifting to alternative models of thinking will no longer be something that would be “nice for us to do some day”…but rather, the shift will become understood as a necessity.

Systems thinking [4] and human factors [5] may be two areas of research to consider but I would think that non-linear dynamics need to be considered as part of the thought methodology.

Yet another, system of consideration was proposed by Sir Austin Bradford Hill [7], in his article, “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?,” (1965). This consideration system will need to be re-examined with the contemporary knowledge (hopefully one that utilizes holistic-oriented methodologies).

Whichever methodology we opt to use will surely need to be tras-disciplinary, and open to multiple views of causality (linear, multilinear, non-linear).

Context
Also, it’s important to differentiate the context of need for nonlinear thought and distributed causality. We obviously don’t need to evaluate every action through this lens with the same degree of rigor attention.

What will need re-understanding and new methodologies
- All logical models and conclusions based on narrow causality
- (others…)

This type of shift in logic system is a shift towards divergence. Once we re-undertand and re-adjust our systems we can compliment the divergence with convergeance and simplexity efforts.


Annotations
[1] Wikipedia: David Hume>>
[2] Wikipedia: “Butterfly effect”>>
[3] Wikipedia: Causality>>
[4] Wikipedia: “Systems thinking” >>
[5] Wikipedia: Human factors>>
[6] Wikipedia:
[7] Austin Bradford Hill, “The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?,” Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 58 (1965), 295-300.Related in Wikipedia
- Chain reactions >>
- Domino effect>>
- Wikipedia: “Control theory”>>
-

Multi-Input-Multi-Output Systems (MIMO)
- http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=15692903
- Build State-Space Models for Multi-Input Multi-Output Systems

Non-linear Control Systems
- “Non-linear control”
**MIMO and non-linear control concepts expose concepts of complex, non-linear causality. These links are only for reference.

“Observability” – Related to: when a system is complex beyond “observability” (or sensing). A possible point towards the end of basic human empiricism
…………………..
-Daniel Montano
…………………..
Keyword: Daniel Montano, Dan Montano, user experience design, information architect

Categories: Complexity · Empathy · Multidisciplinary education · Netsci · Network science · Philosophy · Philosophy of Mind · Physics · Psychological adaptation · Psychology · Quantum physics · Sociology · Systems Theory · Systems intelligence · Systems thinking · Transdisciplinary Education