Originally posted on Coaching for Excellence:
“The essence of the independent mind lies not in what it thinks, but in how it thinks.” — Christopher Hitchens
Exactly what is critical thinking? According to Robert Ellis, author of The Path of Objectivity, critical thinking is reasonable, reflective thinking that is focused on deciding what to believe and what to do. Many of us do not realize our capacity for developing critical thinking. Numerous studies have shown that leaders who practice critical thinking are better able to adapt to the variables that may present within a constantly changing marketplace and competitive business environment. Critical thinking empowers employees, managers and individuals to learn from their mistakes, identify opportunities and overcome challenges both inside and outside of the workplace.
Developing our critical thinking skills requires a conscious and consistent commitment to challenge ourselves to be less judgmental, to think outside the box, to be empathic, and to change our habitual…
View original 454 more words
Originally posted on Health Psychology Consultancy:
Cognitive Biases and Behavioural Economics
It takes the human brain three hundred to seven hundred milliseconds to identify a picture or read a word aloud from a page. We haven’t even begun to scratch the surface of the brain’s potential. However, there are many limitations to how the brain makes decisions; hiccups in our logical thinking that cause us to make unwise decisions. One such hiccup is cognitive bias. Sometimes cognitive biases help our brains process information more quickly and effectively, particularly in a crisis or tense situation where thinking faster has a direct, immediate outcome.
However, these same biases can cause us to make severe errors in judgement when we rely on them alone for processing information. A cognitive bias is a genuine failure in our thought processing – arising from miscalculations, external social influences, or personal experiences. When trading in any market, it is easy to…
View original 893 more words
Originally posted on The Green Rose:
Since graduating with my Masters in Design for Sustainability I’ve had a lot of conversations with friends, family and potential employers about my degree and they mostly just want to know what “Design for Sustainability” actually means. Oh, I remember the good old days of telling people I worked in architecture and seeing the bright light of recognition behind their eyes! Truly, I didn’t understand what I had. But when I entered grad school I didn’t totally understand what I was getting myself into either. I did know that I wanted to spend my life in a creative field where I could improve the Earth’s and therefore our ability to maintain a vibrant, healthy environment. When my future professor described the program as being based on systems thinking, my eyes glazed over; an ironic foreshadowing of future networking conversations. In my job application cover letters, I describe the program as using “human-centered design methodologies, interdisciplinary collaboration…
View original 372 more words
Originally posted on Neurologism:
I came across a very interesting study on McGill University’s excellent .
In this study of collective intelligence, the researchers performed numerous statistical analyses. The most interesting finding that emerged from them, and that went beyond the debate about just what exactly collective intelligence might represent, was that this factor was not highly correlated with either the average intelligence of the groups’ members or with the intelligence of the group member who had scored the highest on the individual-intelligence test. In other words, a group composed of brilliant individuals will not automatically be the most brilliant group.
The psychologists did find some factors that let them predict whether a given group would be collectively intelligent. But to identify three, they had to look at factors associated with co-operation. The first such…
View original 73 more words
Originally posted on Brainwaves For Leaders:
Since human languages vary considerably in the information they convey, scholars have long wondered how this might affect how we think and how we behave. According to Lera Boroditsky, an Associate Professor of Cognitive Science at UCSD, in a 2011 article for Scientific American, “A solid body of evidence showing how language shapes thinking has finally emerged. The evidence overturns the long standing dogma about universality and yields fascinating insights into the origins of knowledge and the construction of reality. The results have important implications for law, politics, and education.”
And business, one might add.
Research in Boroditsky’s lab, as well as…
View original 963 more words
Paper or pixels? Does the medium affect the way people read?
Andrew Dillon Ph.D., the dean of the Graduate School of Information Science at the University of Texas has written a very interesting blog post on the nuances of online reading.
Reading beyond cognition
If you have been reading my blog for a while, you know that I’m interested in the topic of thinking on a holistic level. I consider systems thinking and embodied cognition milestones towards the goal of holistic thinking. Given that interest, I found Mr. Dillon’s comment at #2 in the list below a good reminder to what reading requires:
2) The act of reading involves all levels of human activity: physical, perceptual, cognitive and social. We tend to think of it only as a perceptual and cognitive act but materials must be located and handled, and the forms of information we share reflect cultural and behavioral norms of groups which manifest as genres and types. Any significant act of reading moves seamlessly among these levels of engagement.
The medium matters
Not all types of content should be consumed on the same medium. The medium matters. Your goals behind consuming the content also matters. Consider the following comment from the same article:
With most of the material we read during the working day and online, we often aren’t willing to commit to the full range and stop after scanning. Content providers know this and produce accordingly. Add to this the delivery of digital material on a platform that is constantly refreshing, updating and allows users to multi-task across applications, and the results are a series of short acts involving the perusal and reaction to messages and short form texts that break up the normal progression through deep reading tasks.
Is this bad? Not if your goal is to keep on top of changing contexts and identify facts. Yes if you want to read a novel or really study a technical report.
Read the whole article
This excerpt doesn’t do the original post any justice. I recommend reading the entire article: “Reading Online is Ruining My Life…” Graduate School of Information – University of Texas, blog post by Andrew Dillon Ph.D. Downloaded April 10, 2014 from: http://blogs.ischool.utexas.edu/infomatters/2014/04/10/reading-online-is-ruining-my-life
Listen to a related podcast
I also recommend listening to a recent NPR radio affiliate interview with Mr. Dillon titled: “Is reading online affecting your ability to learn?“. SCPR.org “Airtalk” by Larry Mantle, Downloaded on April 10, 2014.http://www.scpr.org/programs/airtalk/2014/04/10/36878/is-reading-online-affecting-our-ability-to-learn/